The title of this book comes from the IRA’s mantra that all its cadres are taught that when captured and questioned, they are to stonewall, to say nothing. It also is at the heart of one of the many stories within this book, of Jean McConville, supposed informer (or tout) and widowed mother of 10, who was ‘disappeared’ – i.e. abducted and killed in secret – because “The IRA imposes a code of silence akin to the concept of “omerta” in the mafia” (p342) and it is therefore “an offense punishable by death” (ibid) for IRA paramilitary members to reveal details of their deeds and hierarchies. Another key struggle highlighted in the book is the right to confidentiality that testimonies provided are promised with in advance of being given, which can be subsequently breached by court orders, which is also encapsulated by the title. It is of course also a title which flags up how much of IRA activity is shrouded in mystery and silence.
This review is going to be short because for details of the characters and key legends of Northern Ireland’s struggles of the 1970s onwards, the book simply has to be read! The book is not, at the start, an easy read for those who know relatively little about these struggles, and cannot even unravel the cause of the long-held and deep-rooted enmity between the Protestants and Catholics. Derry, or Londonderry, is one of the main sites of protest, the city a
living monument to Protestant resistance. In 1696, Protestant forces loyal to William of Orange, the new king, had managed to hold the city against a siege by Catholic army loyal to James II
p21
which continues to be annually commemorated. Of course the issues must have moved on since then, and the two parties now feud for different reasons, but remain in those two factions.
The book is very sensibly divided up chronologically into 3 parts. The first is of 1960s Northern Ireland, the struggles, the streets, the leading figures of the protests. The 2nd part is when the IRA brought their bombing campaigns to England, and how the British state dealt with the jailed political prisoners, their hunger strikes, the concessions made or not made, the engagement of the Thatcher administration. The 3rd book begins with the Good Friday 1998 agreement of ceasefire, detailing how Gerry Adams transformed the protest to a political movement and party, the backlash, the moving of Northern Ireland from The Troubles of the 20th century, into the modern 21st century, where Belfast may seem like any other cosmopolitan British city, and yet just beneath the surface, or even on the surface, are dischordant tensions, religious segregations,
Tribalisms and its trappings remained so potent in Belfast.
p371
Keefe is a good writer. If the reader will allow him to lead them, he will unfold a comprehensible (even for the uninitiated) and very complete and detailed account of that era in Northern Ireland’s politics, complex and multifaceted, even handedly and yet with passion and pace. He delivers a factual account while managing to make it a suspenseful, even thrilling narrative. He can communicate vast chunks of factual material to the reader with consummate ease, making it easy to grasp and engage with, despite its density of detail. It is extremely skilful writing, and a pleasure just to encounter. Even for those who have no vested interest in these politics, even for those who are not politically inclined, this is a surprisingly good read, full of human interest and intrigues, a beautifully depicted and seemingly faithful portrayal of a particular period and place and its unique politics and people. The Irish come across as a people who have long felt oppressed and may even have built their identity on the fact of their oppression, but who are tough, uncompromising, articulate, intelligent, resourceful, courageous, full of the passion of their convictions. Keefe’s account it not just descriptive, it is analytical and non-partisan, which must be a particularly difficult position to achieve.
This book sounds fascinating! Thanks for the review. I put it on my library list.
Reading this now…it’s full of fascinating details. Such as the Irish referring to the area as ‘the north of Ireland’ — so telling. The historical background was well done: a brisk informative summary, and lots of additional info mentioned as needed.
But then the book gets darker with stories of Catholic women tarred and feathered by the IRA for being too Brit-friendly, or their dogs killed.
I was ignorant of the ‘enhanced interrogation methods’ used by the British army.
I really like the commentary. E.g. the discussion of ‘what-aboutism’ when it come to prosecuting past crimes. “Who should be held accountable for a shared history of violence? Would the British soldiers who shot unarmed civilians [akin to Jallianwala Bagh] be subjected to the same justice as the IRA assassins?” And how does a society come to terms with a violent past? Very thought-provoking.
Am so glad you are enjoying this book and getting so much out of it! I was afraid when I started it, that I was going to be out of my depth completely, because I knew so little about this whole issue. But Radden Keefe really is a good writer, can help even the uninitiated have a good journey through this extremely complicated landscape. He explained so well I never felt lost, never got bogged down in too much detail, his pacing was terrific, so well judged. There feels realms and realms of material, but totally digestible, not overwhelming. Yes, he does seem to see all sides of the issue, and it is a multi-faceted issue indeed!
Multi-faceted indeed, but when I ended the book I had little doubt that the author was in sympathy with the goals (if not the means) of the IRA. This is similar, I think, to many films about Northern Ireland (The Boxer, The Crying Game, In the Name of the Father etc), where the films do not gloss over the IRA assassinations and the bombings but are told from the IRA p.o.v. But those films lack the historical context that this book provided very well, and I now understand the background and issues much better.